Three Decades of Mediation in Israel: Legal Evolution, Institutional Gaps, and Comparative Lessons
2025, 108, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Klasyfikacja
Język publikacji
Abstrakt
This article examines the institutionalization of civil mediation in Israel over the past three decades. Introduced in 1992 via legislative amendment, mediation was gradually integrated into the judicial system through regulations, a court-linked mediation unit, mandatory orientation sessions, and training standards. These reforms strengthened institutional capacity and increased referrals, yet despite these efforts, mediation remains court-dependent, under regulated, and limited in use. Drawing on legal sources, empirical data, and case law, the article critically analyses the Israeli model, highlighting structural and cultural barriers to broader adoption. It argues that successful adoption requires a cultural shift, sustained public investment, and coordinated engagement across sectors. The article offers policy recommendations, including comprehensive legislation, ethical oversight, educational efforts, and data collection. These insights may inform other jurisdictions and invite comparative dialogue on institutional design, the professionalisation of mediation, and mediation as a tool for social reform.
Bibliografia
Alberstein M, Jurisprudence of Mediation, University of Haifa Press and Magnes Press 2007 (Heb)
Amit Y, Privileges and Protected Interests, Nevo Press 2021 (Heb)
Barak A, ‘The Legal System in Israel - Its Tradition and Culture’ (1992) 40 HaPraklit 5
Barak A, ‘On Mediation’ (2002) 3 Sha’arei Mishpat 9 (Heb)
Bayer-Topilsky T and others, Family Court Social Services – National Evaluation Study (Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute 2015) (Heb)
Deutsch O, Mediation: The Awakening Giant, Israel Bar Association Press 1998 (Heb)
Halperin-Kaddari R & Bogoch B, ‘The Voice is the Voice of Mediation, but the Hands are the Hands of the Law: Mediation and Divorce in Israel’ (2007) 49 HaPraklit 293 (Heb)
Mironi M, ‘The Limitations of Settlement Conference and the Promise of Mediation’ (2012) 6 Haifa Law Review 487 (Heb)
Mironi M, ‘Mediation v Case Settlement: The Unsettled Relationship – A Case Study’ (2014) 19 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 173
Moffitt M, ‘Suing Mediators’ (2003) 83 Boston University Law Review 147
Moffitt M, ‘Disciplining Mediators’ in Shapira (ed), Mediation Ethics: A Practitioners’ Guide, American Bar Association Press 2021
Otis L & and Reiter E, ‘Mediation by Judges: A New Phenomenon in the Transformation of Justice’ (2006) 6 Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 351
Perlman K, ‘A Settlement Judge? On Judicial Dispute Resolution and a Proposal for Israeli Law’ (2015) 19 Law & Business 365 (Heb) DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2597428
Rabinovich-Einy O, ‘Pre-Action Protocols, Mediation and Access to Justice under the Proposed Reform ofIsraeli Civil Procedure Rules’ (2005) 9 Mishpatim Al Atar 33 (Heb)
Rosen-Zvi I, ‘Privatising Adjudication’ (2022) 33 Legal Studies 715 (Heb)
Rubinstein M, ‘The Nature of MAHUT – On the Integration of Mediation into Israel’s Court System’ in Barak A and others (eds), Strasberg-Cohen Book, Nevo Press 2017 334 (Heb)
Segal P, ‘The “Mediation Revolution”’ (2019) Ministry of Justice, Legal Roots Project (1 April 2019) (Heb)
Shapira O, ‘The Paradox of Power in Mediation’ (2006) 6 Kiryat HaMishpat 371 (Heb)
Shapira O, ‘On Human Dignity in Mediation’ (2008) 8 Kiryat HaMishpat 373 (Heb)
Shapira O, ‘On the Meaning and Justification of Mediators’ Ethical Duty of Impartiality’ (2012) 28 Bar-Ilan Law Studies 259 (Heb)
Shapira O, ‘Following Permission for Civil Appeal 1496/15 Levi v Drory et al’ (2018) 21 Law & Business 133 (Heb)
Shapira O, ‘Israeli Perspectives on Alternative Dispute Resolution and Justice’ (2019) 19 Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 273
Shapira O, ‘The Significance of Suing Mediators’ in Hinshaw A and others (eds), Discussions in Dispute Resolution: Volume II, Oxford University Press (2025) DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197784518.003.0039
Shapira O & Zilberstein C (eds), Mediation Ethics: Codes of Ethics and Dilemmas, Magnes Press 2018 (Heb)
Sivan F & Rabinovich-Einy O, ‘Mediating Procedure and Substance: On the Privatization of the Justice System and Equality at Work’ (2008) 11 Law & Government 517 (Heb)
Sorek Y and others, Family and Religious Court Social Services: A National Evaluation
Study RR-993-24, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute 2024 (Heb)
Sulitzeanu-Kenan R, Reichman A & Vigoda-Gadot E, Judicial Workload: A Comparative Study of 17 Countries, Haifa Centre for Public Management & Policy 2007 (Heb)
Welsh N, ‘But Is It Good: The Need to Measure, Assess, and Report on Court-Connected ADR’ (2021) 22 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 427
Welsh N, ‘Bringing Transparency and Accountability (with a Dash of Competition) to Court-Connected Dispute Resolution’ (2020) 88 Fordham Law Review 2449
Zamir R, ‘The Myth of Mediator Neutrality’ (2013) 17 Law & Business 411 (Heb)
Zamir Y, ‘Mediation in Public Affairs’ (2004) 7 Law & Government 119 (Heb)
Zer-Gutman L, ‘Ensuring Confidentiality in Mediation’ (2002) 3 Sha’arei Mishpat 165 (Heb)
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
05.05.2026
Open accessmediationcomplaint against a mediatormediation servicescomparative legalsustainable dispute resolutionjust lawpre-constitutional Europecopyright lawprotection of water resourcesregulation of water resourcesContents
- Open accessprospective subsumptionretrospective subsumptionmediation basic normdecision-making processmediationAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Prospective Subsumption and The Model Basic Norm in Mediation in Civil Cases – Some Remarks From The Perspective of Legal Theory and Practice
- Open accessquality of mediationcontrol of the mediatordisciplinary liability of the mediator
Complaint Against a Mediator as a Mechanism For Controlling The Quality of Mediation Services From A Comparative Legal Perspective
Podobne publikacje
05.05.2026
Open accessmediationcomplaint against a mediatormediation servicescomparative legalsustainable dispute resolutionjust lawpre-constitutional Europecopyright lawprotection of water resourcesregulation of water resourcesContents
- Open accessprospective subsumptionretrospective subsumptionmediation basic normdecision-making processmediationAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Prospective Subsumption and The Model Basic Norm in Mediation in Civil Cases – Some Remarks From The Perspective of Legal Theory and Practice
- Open accessquality of mediationcontrol of the mediatordisciplinary liability of the mediator
Complaint Against a Mediator as a Mechanism For Controlling The Quality of Mediation Services From A Comparative Legal Perspective