Mediation and Sustainability: The Role of Decisive Actions in Promoting Sustainable Dispute Resolution – Lessons from the Italian “Cartabia Reform”
2025, 108, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Klasyfikacja
Język publikacji
Abstrakt
There is an undeniable need for decisive actions to advance mediation as a sustainable method within Poland’s dispute resolution framework. Italy’s recent approach serves as a noteworthy example, with the “Cartabia Reform”, enacted through Legislative Decree No. 149 on October 10, 2022, and supplemented by additional decrees, offering actionable insights into the effective promotion of sustainable dispute resolution practices. The Italian experience, marked bysuggests a pathway for Poland to integrate mediation more deeply into its legal system, presenting it as a cost-effective and socially beneficial alternative to traditional litigation. Enacted in late 2022, the reform significantly strengthens mediation to improve access to justice and reduce court congestion, aligning with broader EU goals for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). A core element of the reform is the implementation of robust fiscal incentives. By expanding tax relief—such as exemptions from stamp and registration duties on mediation documents and agreements—the reform provides a significant financial advantage over traditional litigation. This alleviates financial barriers, encouraging broader adoption among individuals and businesses, especially in high-value disputes, promoting mediation as a pragmatic, cost-effective choice. Beyond financial benefits, the reform introduces key procedural updates. These include extending mediation duration, enabling remote participation for greater accessibility, and granting judges the power to refer disputes to mediation even during appeal proceedings. These measures frame mediation as a sustainable process that fosters dialogue and social integration while easing the strain on the judicial system. Italy’s systematic approach, leveraging regulatory improvements and targeted incentives, positions it as a leading EU example. By adopting insights from the Cartabia Reform, Poland can strengthen its legal framework around mediation, achieving both economic efficiency for parties and broader societal benefits in conflict resolution
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Barbagallo I, Civil and Commercial Mediation in Italy – Part One: Origins and Functioning for a Comparative View i n K A Gajda, M P ietras-Eichberger a nd M S kawińska (eds), Mediation as an Inclusive and Sustainable Method of Resolving Conflicts (Peter Lang, Berlin, 2025, Chapter VII)
Barbagallo I, ‛I fattori di successo o insuccesso di una mediazione’ in Mediares, Primiceri Ed., Padova, Italy, 2024 n. 2, 230–243, available at <https://www.mediaresrivista.it/articolo.php?annata=2024-2&numero=>accessed 29 June 2025
Borselli E, ‛Mediazione e processo civile riformato: quando il giudice dispone l’invio?’ in Giustizia consensuale, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli (Italy), 2024, n. 2, 527–558
Botti V, Mediation of Civil Affairs in Italy – Second Part: Tax Benefits in the Fiscal Approach toSupportingSustainability, in KA Gajda, M Pietras-Eichberger and M Skawińska (eds), Mediation as anInclusive and Sustainable Method of Resolving Conflicts (Peter Lang, Berlin, 2025, Chapter VIII)
De Palo G, D’urso L, Achieving a Balanced Relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings, ‘In-Depth Analysis, The Implementation of the Mediation Directive’ – Workshop 29 November 2016. Policy Departmentfor Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament,<https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/571395/IPOL_IDA(2016)571395_EN.pdf> accessed 13 December 2025
Domenegotti M, Cammarano J, Il processo civile dopo il Decreto Correttivo della Riforma Cartabia (Altalex, Wolters Kluwer, Milano, 21 February 2025), <https://www.altalex.com/documents/news/2025/02/21/processo-civile-dopo-decreto-correttivoriforma-cartabia#p6> accessed 12 May 2025
Ferrari Aggradi A, Visonà F, ‛La Mediazione obbligatoria: un aumento di costi davvero insostenibile?’, in Mediares, Primiceri Ed., Padova, Italy, 2023, n. 2, 145–156, <https://www.mediaresrivista.it/articolo.php?annata=2023-2&numero=6> accessed 7 June 2025
Gmurzyńska E, ‘Analysis of the Causes of Conflicts at Universities and Alternative Methods of Resolving Them. Part I: Mediation in Academic Disputes’ (Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2021, Vol XXX, 1, 55–101) DOI: 10.17951/sil.2021.30.2.149-203
Lucarelli P, ‛Mediazione dei conflitti: una spinta generosa verso il cambiamento’ (Giustizia consensuale, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2021, n. 1, 15–31), <https://efforts.unimi.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2021/08/Giustizia-consensuale_1_2021.pdf> accessed 23 May 2025
Maione M, Rapporti tra mediazione obbligatoria e processo civile alla luce della Riforma Cartabia, in ‛ildirittoprocessualecivile.it’, Italy, 2023, 2, 452–471, <https://www.ildirittoprocessualecivile.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2_2023_contributo-05.pdf> accessed 12 December 2025
Matteucci G, Mediazione civile e commerciale in Italia dopo la Riforma Cartabia, Aracne Ed., Roma, 2024
Matteucci G, ‘Mandatory Mediation, the Italian Experience, a Case Study – 2025’, Beijing Law Review, 2025, Vol 16, 353–376, available at <https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2025.161017> accessed 13 December 2025 DOI: 10.4236/blr.2025.161017
Mazzamuto P, ‛La mediazione conciliativa secondo la Riforma Cartabia’, GIURETA, Università di Palermo, Palermo (Italy), 2024, Vol XXII, 331–381, <https://www.giureta.unipa.it/2024/14_Mazzamuto_DirPriv_2024.pdf> accessed 8 December 2025
Occorsio MV, ‛La decadenza nella procedura di mediazione dopo la Riforma Cartabia; Riflessioni a margine della sentenza del Tribunale di Napoli, sez. IV, n. 8555,del 20.9.2023 e dei successivi orientamentigiurisprudenziali’, in n. 2, in Mediares, Primiceri Ed., Padova, Italy, 2024, n. 2, 244–275, <https://www.mediaresrivista.it/articolo.php?annata=2024-2&numero=10> accessed 14 December 2025
Reggio F, ‛La sfida di ogni riforma: dalle paper rules alle real rules᾿ (Mediares, Primiceri Ed., Padova, Italy, 2023, n. 1, 1-–7), <https://www.mediaresrivista.it/articolo.php?annata=2023-1&numero=0> accessed 20 May 2025
Skawińska M, ‘Mediation for Sustainable Resolution of Commercial Disputes within the Polish Legal Framework: A Path to Sustainable Development’, in KA Gajda, M Pietras-Eichberger and M Skawińska (eds), Mediation as an Inclusive and Sustainable Method of Resolving Conflicts (Peter Lang, Berlin, 2025, Chapter VI)
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
05.05.2026
Open accessmediationcomplaint against a mediatormediation servicescomparative legalsustainable dispute resolutionjust lawpre-constitutional Europecopyright lawprotection of water resourcesregulation of water resourcesContents
- Open accessprospective subsumptionretrospective subsumptionmediation basic normdecision-making processmediationAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Prospective Subsumption and The Model Basic Norm in Mediation in Civil Cases – Some Remarks From The Perspective of Legal Theory and Practice
- Open accessquality of mediationcontrol of the mediatordisciplinary liability of the mediator
Complaint Against a Mediator as a Mechanism For Controlling The Quality of Mediation Services From A Comparative Legal Perspective
Podobne publikacje
05.05.2026
Open accessmediationcomplaint against a mediatormediation servicescomparative legalsustainable dispute resolutionjust lawpre-constitutional Europecopyright lawprotection of water resourcesregulation of water resourcesContents
- Open accessprospective subsumptionretrospective subsumptionmediation basic normdecision-making processmediationAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Prospective Subsumption and The Model Basic Norm in Mediation in Civil Cases – Some Remarks From The Perspective of Legal Theory and Practice
- Open accessquality of mediationcontrol of the mediatordisciplinary liability of the mediator
Complaint Against a Mediator as a Mechanism For Controlling The Quality of Mediation Services From A Comparative Legal Perspective