Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Studia Iuridica

A Democratic Toolkit Hidden in Mediation: Dialogical and Discursive Roots of Mediation and Democracy

2025, 108, Numer 1


Data publikacji

19.12.2025

Model publikowania

-

Rodzaj licencji

-

Dziedzina

Dziedzina nauk społecznych

Dyscyplina

nauki prawne

Klasyfikacja

-

Język publikacji

Angielski

Pliki do pobrania

PDF 498 KB

Artykuł

Liczba wyświetleń:35

Liczba pobrań:15

Cytowania Crossref:0

Wynik Altmetric:0

Zobacz mapę pobrań

Abstrakt

The article presents mediation as a broader concept, deeply rooted in the principles of democracy. At first glance, it may be difficult to see mediation as a realization of democratic values, and the concepts of mediation and democracy may seem analytically distant. Democracy usually relates to a political system, while mediation involves resolving conflicts between parties in individual situa-tions. However, as the authors explain, the fundamental principles of democracy and mediation—which is a meeting between conflicting parties with the participation of a neutral third party—share significant similarities. The article examines democratic principles such as individual autonomy, the promotion of the com-mon good, the pursuit of consensus, the guarantee of fair procedures, and the shaping of civic atti-tudes in the context of mediation. It demonstrates that the core principles of democracy are reflect-ed in mediation, on a micro level, within the process of resolving individual disputes. The model of deliberative democracy and the concept of "living democracy" or social capital suggest that democ-racy is not solely limited to the functioning of democratic institutions but must also encompass citi-zen participation and inclusion in everyday activities beyond those institutions. This broader under-standing of democracy places mediation at the heart of living democracy. The authors explore the relationship between mediation and democracy through key philosophical concepts: the philosophy of discourse and the philosophy of dialogue. Both, the discursive and dia-logical philosophies serve as foundational elements of democracy. These philosophies also offer a more universal understanding of mediation, not just as a method for reaching an agreement but also as a tool for personal growth, understanding others’ perspectives, and building social bonds. In their analysis, the authors conclude that mediation, as a method of dispute resolution and a plat-form for human interaction, aligns with the model and principles of deliberative democracy.

Bibliografia

Alexy R, ‘Idée et structure d’un système du droit rationnel’ (1988) La philosophie du droit aujourd’hui, Archives de philosophie du droit 33, 25–26 (Sirey)

Alexy R, ‘A Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Practical Reason’ in Law’s Ideal Dimension (Oxford University Press 2021) 255–274 <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0019>. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0018

Alexy R, ‘Legal Argumentation as Rational Discourse in Law’s Ideal Dimension’ in Law’s Ideal Dimension (Oxford University Press 2021) 288–298 <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0019> DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0020

Allen A and Mendieta E (eds), The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon (Cambridge University Press 2016)

Bednarz M, ‘Demokracja uczestnictwa i społeczeństwo informatyczne a szanse na przezwyciężenie nierówności społecznych’ (2004) Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy 4, 139–150

Buber M, Ich und Du (Insel Verlag 1923)

Bush R, Baruch A and Folger JP, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition (Jossey-Bass / John Wiley & Sons 2004)

Bush R, Baruch A and Folger JP, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition (rev edn, Jossey-Bass 2024)

Bush R, Baruch A and Folger JP, ‘Mediation and Social Justice: Risks and Opportunities’ (2012) 27 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 1–52

Cloke K, Mediation: Revenge and the Magic of Forgiveness (Center for Dispute Resolution 1994)

Daicoff SS, Comprehensive Law Practice: Law as a Healing Profession (Carolina Academic Press 2011)

Damen D and others, ‘The Effect of Perspective Taking on Trust and Understanding in Online and Face-to-Face Mediations’ (2020) 29 Group Decision and Negotiation 1121–1144 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09698-8> DOI: 10.1007/s10726-020-09698-8

Davis AM and Salem RA, ‘Dealing with Power Imbalances in the Mediation of Interpersonal Disputes’ (1984) 6 Mediation Quarterly 17–30 DOI: 10.1002/crq.38919840604

De Girolamo D, ‘The Mediation Process: Challenges to Neutrality and the Delivery of Procedural Justice’ (2019) 39 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 834–861 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqz011

DeVault R, Parks W and Aruguete M, ‘The Benefits of Promoting Party Self-Determination in Mediation’ (October 2022) Colorado Lawyer 12–19

Dewey J, Democracy and Education (1916; reprinted Pennsylvania State University Electronic Classics Series)<https://nsee.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/KnowledgeCenter/BuildingExpEduc/BooksReports/10.%20democracy%20and%20education%20by%20dewey.pdf>

Dworkin I, ‘Philosophy of Dialogue: A Historical and Systematic Introduction’ (2020) 13 Judaica Petropolitana 6–24

Encyclopaedia Britannica, ‘Democracy’ <https://www.britannica.com/topic/democracy>

Gmurzyńska E, ‘Sprawiedliwość a mediacja’ in J Gudowski and K Weitz (eds), Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora T Erecińskiego, Vol II (Lexis Nexis 2011) 1674–1688

Gmurzyńska E, Rola prawników w alternatywnych metodach rozwiązywania sporów (CH Beck 2014)

Guthrie Ch and Levin J, ‘A Party Satisfaction Perspective on a Comprehensive Mediation Statute’ (1998) 13 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 885–922

Gutmann A and Thompson DF, ‘Valuing Compromise for the Common Good’ (2013) 142(2) Daedalus 185–198 DOI: 10.1162/DAED_a_00212

Habermas J, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Beacon Press 1979)

Habermas J, The Theory of Communicative Action (Beacon Press 1984)

Jakubiak-Mirończuk A, ‘Effectiveness of Mediation – Between Effort and Result’ (2018) 27 Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 13–29 DOI: 10.17951/sil.2018.27.3.13-34

Kmieciak Z, Postępowanie administracyjne w świetle standardów europejskich (Wydawnictwo ABC 1997)

Koncewicz T, Poszukując modelu sprawiedliwości proceduralnej w prawie wspólnotowym: Mit czy rzeczywistość? (Centrum Europejskie 2009)

Kruse KR, ‘Learning from Practice: What ADR Needs from a Theory of Justice’ (2004–05) 5 Nevada Law Journal 389–406

Lappe FM and DuBois PM, The Quickening of America: Rebuilding Our Nation, Remaking Our Lives (Jossey-Bass 1994)

Lind EA and Tyler TR, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Plenum Press 1988) DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4

McEwen CA and Maiman RJ, ‘Mediation in Small Claims Court: Achieving Compliance Through Consent’ (1984) 18 Law & Society Review 11–50 DOI: 10.2307/3053479

Menkel-Meadow C, ‘The Lawyer’s Role(s) in Deliberative Democracy’ (2004) 5 Nevada Law Journal 34–48

Menkel-Meadow C, ‘Deliberative Democracy and Conflict Resolution’ (2005–06) 12 Dispute Resolution Magazine 18

Morek R, ‘Wprowadzenie’ in Gmurzyńska E and Morek R (eds), Mediacje. Teoria i Praktyka (Wolters Kluwer 2024) 22–31

Nolan-Haley JM, ‘Informed Consent in Mediation: A Guiding Principle for Truly Educated Decisionmaking’ 1999) 74 Notre Dame Law Review 775–840

Nolan-Haley JM, ‘Informed Consent in Mediation: A Guiding Principle for Truly Educated Decisionmaking’ (2012) 10 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1–28

Pavlich G, ‘The Power of Community Mediation: Government and Formation of Self-Identity’ (1996) 30 Law & Society Review 707–733 DOI: 10.2307/3054115

Putnam RD, ‘What Makes Democracy Work’ (1993) National Civic Review (Spring)101–107 DOI: 10.1002/ncr.4100820204

Putnam RD, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton UniversityPress 1993) DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7

Rawls J, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press 1971) DOI: 10.4159/9780674042605

Rawls J, Teoria sprawiedliwości (Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN 1994)

Riskin LL, ‘Understanding Mediators’ Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed’ (1996) 1 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7–51

Rossmanith A, Dialogiczna koncepcja prawa (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2019)

Solum LB, ‘Procedural Justice’ (2004) 78 Southern California Law Review 273–321 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.508282

Šimac S, ‘Mediation as Generator of Change in Judicial System and Legal Profession’ in Liras SM, Brown K and Navas Paús E (eds), Mediation across the Globe (Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2018) 1–37

Śpiewak P, Obietnice demokracji (Pruszyński i S-ka 2004)

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ‘Martin Buber’ (2023) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/buber/>

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ‘Common Good’ (2025) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2025/entries/common-good/>

Stelmach J, Współczesna filozofia interpretacji prawniczej (Wydawnictwo UJ 2001)

Stelmach J, Kodeks argumentacyjny dla prawników (Zakamycze 2004)

Summers RS, ‘Evaluating and Improving Legal Process: A Plea for Process Values’ (1974) 60 Cornell Law Review 1–52

Thibaut J and Walker L, Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1975)

Tischner J, Filozofia dramatu (Znak 1990)

Tyler TR, ‘Psychological Model of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice’ (1994) 67 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 850–863 DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.5.850

Tymiński R, ‘Zagadnienie tworzenia prawa w filozofii niemieckich prawnonaturalistów Ernsta-WolfgangaBöckenfördego i Otfrieda Höffe’ (2006) Studia Iuridica 45, 233–250

Waldman E, ‘What ADR Needs to Learn from Procedural Justice: The Case of Divorce Mediation’ (2011) University of Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution 2011(1) 49–84

Welsh NA, ‘The Place of Court-Connected Mediation in a Democratic Justice System’ (2004) 5 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 117–154 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1726218

Welsh NA, ‘Disputants’ Decision Control in Court-Connected Mediation: A Work in Progress’ (2004) University of Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution 2004(1), 1–44

Welsh NA, ‘Do You Believe in Magic? Self-Determination and Procedural Justice Meet Inequality in Court-Connected Mediation’ (2017) 70 SMU Law Review 721–754

Węgrzecki J, ‘Przyszłość demokracji deliberatywnej’ (2009) Athenaeum: Polskie Studia Politologiczne 22, 27–40 DOI: 10.15804/athena.2009.22.02

Wygnański J, ‘Inny pomysł na demokrację’ (1 June 2021) Więź <https://wiez.pl/2021/06/01/inny-pomysl-na-demokracje> accessed 3 February 2025

Zienkiewicz A, Studium Mediacji. Od teorii ku praktyce (Difin 2002)

Zienkiewicz A, Holizm prawniczy z perspektywy Comprehensive Law Movement (Difin 2018)

Zienkiewicz A, ‘Objectives of Mediation and Selection and Implementation of Mediation Strategies and Techniques by Mediators in Civil Disputes – Study Report (Part III – Interviews)’ (2023) 32(2) Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 303–332 DOI: 10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.303-332

Podobne publikacje