PUNISHMENT IN CASES OF OFFENCES AGAINST CULTURAL HERITAGE. MODEL REMARKS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF UNESCO AND THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTIONS
2025, 107, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Klasyfikacja
Język publikacji
Abstrakt
Among the issues raised internationally that relate to the protection of cultural heritage, increasing attention is being paid to the individual responsibility of perpetrators of crimes against cultural property. The aim to harmonise the level of criminal law protection of cultural property in national legal systems is seen as one of the most important factors that could reduce crime in this area. Legislative initiatives undertaken by countries in order to strengthen the criminal law protection of cultural property focus primarily on two groups of problems: the development of a catalogue of offences against cultural property and the determination of the type and amount of sanctions with which these offences should be threatened. In the search for an optimal pattern of penalisation, the article identifies the norms of international law influencing the scope of penalisation of behaviours violating the principles of protection of cultural property in the national legal orders and analyses the legislative achievements so far obtained within the framework of international cooperation at the universal and regional (European) level. The considerations were concentrated around three key issues, which were considered to be: the notion of just punishment, the analysis of the scope of criminal law protection of cultural property set out in the documents of UNESCO and the Council of Europe, and the type and amount of sanctions that should be applied to behaviour directed against cultural property under legal protection. The last part of the article consists of the final conclusions formulated after an autonomous assessment of the regulations adopted in the two systems of international cooperation on the criminal law protection of cultural heritage indicated above.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Bottigliero I, Redress for victims of crimes under international law, Springer Dortrecht 2004
Buchała K, Zoll A, Polskie prawo karne, Warszawa 1995
Carta MC, Detention conditions and treatment of prisoners in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights in Gerecka-Zołyńska A (ed), International legal sources of implementation of the humanitarian principle in the case of imprisonment, Poznan 2021
Cieślak M, Polskie prawo karne, Warszawa 1999
Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Convention on Offences Relating to Cultural Property
Gerecka-Żołyńska A, Procesowe oczekiwania ofiar w postępowaniu przed Międzynarodowym Trybunałem Karnym na tle zasady rzetelnego postępowania sądowego in Hominum causa omne ius constitutum sit. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Piotra Hofmańskiego, Czarnecki P and others (eds), Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2024
Heller KJ, Dubber MD (eds) The handbook of comparative criminal law, Stanford University Press 2011
Janiszewski B, Sprawiedliwość kary. Rozważania w świetle prawnych podstaw jej wymiaru in Szwarc AJ (ed), Rozważania o prawie karnym. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 70. urodzin Profesora Aleksandra Ratajczaka, Poznań 1999
Kowalski W, Restytucja dzieł sztuki w prawie międzynarodowym, Katowice 1989
Manacorda S, Criminal Law Protection of Cultural Heritage: An International Perspective in Manacorda S, Chappell D (eds), Crime in the Art and Antiquities World Illegal Trafficking in Cultural Property, Springer 2011
Martorell A, The role of cultural heritage in the global society in Szmygin B (ed), Heritage in transformation: cultural heritage protection in the XXI century – problems, challenges, predictions, Lublin 2016
O’ Keefe R, The Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict, Cambridge 2006
Pelc V, Criminal Penalties Affecting Property in Jelinek J, Záhora J (eds), Sanctions under criminal law, Wolter Kluwers Budapest 2019
Petasz P, Sens, istota i cele kary kryminalnej, Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, 2005, Vol XIV Plata A, Spór o zbiory Muzeum Brytyjskiego, Gdańsk 2024
Przyborowska-Klimczak A, Rozwój ochrony dziedzictwa kulturalnego w prawie międzynarodowym na przełomie XX i XXI wieku, Lublin 2011
Veitch S, Moral Conflict and Legal Reasoning, Oxford, Portland Oregon 2002
Warylewski J, Kara. Podstawy filozoficzne i historyczne, Gdańsk 2007
Zalewski W, O pojmowaniu sprawiedliwości w prawie karnym, Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, 2005, Vol XIV
Zeidler K, Restitution of cultural property. Hard Case. Theory of Argumentation. Philosophy of Law, Gdańsk-Warszawa 2016
Zwegers B, Cultural Heritage in Transition: A Multi-Level Perspective on World Heritage in Germany and the United Kingdom, 1970-202, Springer 2022
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
- Open accesscultural heritagecriminal procedurepolice camerasright to voteindependence of the judiciarysupervisory boardsconsumer protectioninternational law
Content
- Open accessprosecuting authoritiesassistancestate authoritieslocal government institutions
OBLIGATION OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO AUTHORITIES CONDUCTING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (ARTICLE 15 § 2 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE)
- Open accesscamerasbody-worn cameraspolicesurveillancenew technologiesartificial intelligence
THE COMPARISON OF POLISH AND GERMAN MODELS FOR THE UTILISATION OF POLICE BODY-WORN CAMERAS
Podobne publikacje
- Open accesscultural heritagecriminal procedurepolice camerasright to voteindependence of the judiciarysupervisory boardsconsumer protectioninternational law
Content
- Open accessprosecuting authoritiesassistancestate authoritieslocal government institutions
OBLIGATION OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO AUTHORITIES CONDUCTING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (ARTICLE 15 § 2 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE)
- Open accesscamerasbody-worn cameraspolicesurveillancenew technologiesartificial intelligence
THE COMPARISON OF POLISH AND GERMAN MODELS FOR THE UTILISATION OF POLICE BODY-WORN CAMERAS