THE INDIGENOUS SUBJECT IN LAW: AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CARTESIAN SUBJECTIVITY AND THE RULE
2023, 96, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Klasyfikacja
Język publikacji
Abstrakt
This paper addresses a key question raised by the tension between the subject of normative law and indigenous, collective systems. Within the framework of the Lacanian psychoanalysis, the author explores Cartesian specificity of a legal subject. He argues that structural nature of that legal construct not only affects an individual ontologically but also reorients the dialectics inherent in legal dogmatism. Following Baudrillardian thought, it is assumed in the paper that the total opposition to normative law is not the absence of law but rather the Rule. The Rule is a concept engaging the individual into dialectics of a game and at the same time ruling out any sense of inherently legal transgression. However, the context of indigenous systems based on the Rule, besides amplifying an alienating effect of the individualization of responsibility, also explains the incongruity of normative law in some cultural contexts. The failure to integrate indigenous, traditional and local legal systems into the post-colonial normative discourse is just one of many illustrations of this. As an exemplary case, the author evokes injustice (in the Lyotardian sense) resulting from litigation simultaneously based both on Brahmanical marriage rules and the Hindu Code Bill. In its final part, the text summarises the impasses of the legal dialogue with indigenous rules and the ways of emancipation for an individual imbedded in the Cartesian subjectivity, which are inspired by transcultural encounters.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Barthes R., Empire of Signs, New York 1989
Baudrillard J., Seduction, Montreal 1990 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20638-4
Bhikkhu T., Udana: Exclamations, Tittha Sutta: Sectarians, Barre 2012
Cooper v Stuart [1889] 14 App Cas 286
Cornell D., Beyond Accommodation, Lanham 1999
Freud S., Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 12: Das Unheimliche, Wien 1919
Galanter M., The Aborted Restoration of 'Indigenous' Law in India, 'Comparative Studies in Society and History' 1972, Vol. 14(1) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500006502
Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (No. 169), International Labour Organization, 27 June 1989 (ILO C169)
Khosla G. D., Our Judicial System, Allahabad 1949
Krishnadas J., From East to West: Can Feminist Legal Strategies be Transformative? Post-disaster to Everyday Times of Crisis, 'Jindal Global Law Review' 2019, Vol. 10(2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-019-00103-3
Lacan J., L'étourdit, Autres Écrits, Paris 2005
Lacan J., Le séminaire XXI, Les non-dupes errent, Unpublished
Lacan J., Le séminaire XXII, R.S.I., Unpublished
Lacan J., Le séminaire. Livre XVIII. D'un discours qui ne serait pas du semblant, Paris 2006
Lacan J., Le séminaire. Livre XIX. … ou pire, Paris 2011
Lacan J., Le séminaire. Livre XXIII. Le sinthome, Paris 2005
Lacan J., Les écrits techniques de Freud: La leçon de 12 mai 1954, Paris 1975
Lacan J., The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book XX. Encore, London 1998
Lakshmi P., Personal Laws and the Rights of Women, 'Christ University Law Journal' 2012, Vol. 1(1) https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.1.6
Lal K. S., The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India, New Delhi 1993
Lévi-Strauss C., The Savage Mind, London 1966
Lyotard J.-F., Le Différend, Paris 1983
Melton A. P., Indigenous Justice Systems and Tribal Society, 'Judicature' 1995, Vol. 79(3)
Melton A. P., Traditional and Contemporary Tribal Law Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis, Western Social Science Association, 31st Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico 1989
Miller J.-A., The Unconscious and the Speaking Body, Presentation of the theme for the X Congress of the WAP, Rio de Janeiro 2016
Morse B. W., Woodman G. R., Indigenous Law and State Legal Systems: Conflict and Compatibility, (in:) B. W. Morse, G. R. Woodman (eds), Indigenous Law and the State, Dordrecht 1987 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854800
Pascal B., OEuvres complètes, Paris 1963
R v Murrell [1836] NSWSupC 35
Resolution 12.5 Protection of Traditional Ways of Life, IUCN, GA 1975 RES 005
Sahani R., Nandy Sh. K., Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups in India: An Overview, 'Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India' 2013, 62(2)
Tso T., The Process of Decision-Making in Tribal Courts, 'Arizona Law Review' 1989, Vol. 31
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, United Nations GA Resolution A/RES/61/295, 13 September 2007
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
- Open access
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Open accessindigenous peoplesCatholic social thoughtcanon lawself-determinationInnocent IVPaulus Vladimiri
THE EVOLUTION OF PAPAL SOCIAL THOUGHT ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
- Open accessindigenous peoplesindigenous rightsreligious freedomtraditional religionscriminal lawcultural defencespossession of drugscultural diversityinternational human rights law
DRUG POSSESSION, CHILEAN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, AND CULTURAL DEFENSES
Podobne publikacje
- Open access
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Open accessindigenous peoplesCatholic social thoughtcanon lawself-determinationInnocent IVPaulus Vladimiri
THE EVOLUTION OF PAPAL SOCIAL THOUGHT ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
- Open accessindigenous peoplesindigenous rightsreligious freedomtraditional religionscriminal lawcultural defencespossession of drugscultural diversityinternational human rights law
DRUG POSSESSION, CHILEAN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, AND CULTURAL DEFENSES