THE NEW SEXUAL OFFENCES IN THE LIGHT OF DIGITALISATION
2022, 93, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Klasyfikacja
Język publikacji
Abstrakt
Digitalisation has given rise to many new types of offences against sexual autonomy that previously either did not exist or at least were not so easily and quickly perpetrated. The first of these is the category of deepfakes. The term “deep” refers to the deep learning, AI-based technology; “fake” denotes a manipulation, which, in summary, is the use of algorithms to manipulate images or video footage to make it possible to mount someone’s face in a lifelike form on the footage – typically pornographic footage – that does not initially depict them. In practice, however, deepfakes are used not only in connection with pornographic content but often also to discredit political or business opponents. Revenge porn usually involves publishing pornographic images of the victim by the former partner out of jealousy or revenge for the break-up of a relationship. Such images or videos may be of the (typically nude) victim himself or herself, a sexual act between the perpetrator and the victim, or may be manipulated images rather than real ones, where revenge pornography is combined with deepfakes. Upskirting literally means “photographing under a skirt”, which typically involves taking unauthorised pictures or videos of female victims’ crotches. Of course, cameras existed before the advent of digitalisation, but it is only in the last decade or so that large numbers of people have a smartphone with the ability to take high-quality pictures of virtually every passer-by. Unfortunately, technological progress in this area has had a criminogenic effect, since it is easy to take such pictures or videos of an unsuspecting victim quickly and often unnoticed using a mobile phone. Cyberflashing is the phenomenon of sending a picture or video of the offender’s genitalia to the victim via a digital device without prior consent or agreement.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Armesto-Larson B., Nonconsensual pornography: Criminal law solutions to a worldwide problem, "Oregon Review of International Law" 2020, No. 1.
Berghäuser G., Upskirting und ähnliche Verhaltensweisen Unbefugte fotografische oder filmische Aufnahmen unter der Oberbekleidung, "Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik" 2019, No. 10
Bodori K., Criminal law-related issues to cyberflashing: Report, Budapest 2021
Delfino R. A., Pornographic deepfakes: The case for federal criminalization of revenge porn's next tragic act, "Fordham Law Review" 2019, No. 3 https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.1.105-141
Hong K., A new mens rea for rape: More convictions and less punishment, "American Criminal Law Review" 2018, No. 2
Linkous T., It's time for revenge porn to get a taste of its own medicine: An argument for the federal criminalization of revenge porn, "Richmond Journal of Law & Technology" 2014, No. 4
Lipschitz G., Can the issues of cyberbullying and sexting be addressed by legislation alone? A critical analysis of the current legislative measures and societal measures needed to protect our youth in the digital realm, "Edinburgh Student Law Review" 2020, No. 1
Marvin J. T., Without a bright-line on the green line: How Commonwealth v. Robertson failed to criminalize upskirt photography, "New England Law Review" 2015, No. 1
McGlynn C., Johnson K., Criminalising cyberflashing: Options for law reform, "The Journal of Criminal Law" 2020, No. 3 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018320972306
Miller B. C., Fact or phallus? Considering the consitutionality of Texas's cyber-flashing law under the true threat doctrine, "Texas A&M Law Review" 2021, No. 2 https://doi.org/10.37419/LR.V8.I2.6
Sales J. S., Magaldi J. A., Deconstructing the statutory landscape of "revenge porn": An evaluation of the elements that make an effective nonconsensual pornography statute, "American Criminal Law Review" 2020, No. 4 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3608398
Sorbán K., A bosszúpornó és deepfake pornográfia büntetőjogi fenyegetettségének szükségességéről, "Belügyi Szemle" 2020, No. 10 https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ.2020.10.4
Stathi J. L., Criminal law - when upskirting was not illegal: A court-ordered legislative fix - Commonwealth v. Robertson, 5 N.E.3D 522 (Mass. 2014), "Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy" 2015, No. 1
Szomora Zs., A nemi élet szabadsága és a nemi erkölcs elleni bűncselekmények, (in:) Karsai K. (ed.), Nagykommentár a Büntető Törvénykönyvről szóló 2012. évi C. törvényhez, Budapest 2019
Whiteman M., Upskirting, BitCoin, and crime, oh my: Judicial resistance to apply old laws to new crimes - what is a legislature to do?, "Indiana Law Journal Supplement" 2020, No. 5
Yar M., Drew J., Image-based abuse, non-consensual pornography, revenge porn: A study of criminalization and crime prevention in Australia and England & Wales, "International Journal of Cyber Criminology" 2019, No. 2
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
- Open access
Spis treści/Table of Contents
- Open accessnullum crimen sine legeprinciple of legalitypenal responsibilityadministrative-criminal responsibilitylex retro non agit
ZASADA "NULLUM CRIMEN SINE LEGE" W ORZECZNICTWIE SĄDÓW ADMINISTRACYJNYCH
- Open accessparticularly audacious theftqualified type of crimewobbler
PRZESTĘPSTWO KRADZIEŻY SZCZEGÓLNIE ZUCHWAŁEJ W KODEKSIE KARNYM Z 1997 R.
Podobne publikacje
- Open access
Spis treści/Table of Contents
- Open accessnullum crimen sine legeprinciple of legalitypenal responsibilityadministrative-criminal responsibilitylex retro non agit
ZASADA "NULLUM CRIMEN SINE LEGE" W ORZECZNICTWIE SĄDÓW ADMINISTRACYJNYCH
- Open accessparticularly audacious theftqualified type of crimewobbler
PRZESTĘPSTWO KRADZIEŻY SZCZEGÓLNIE ZUCHWAŁEJ W KODEKSIE KARNYM Z 1997 R.