THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS IN FOLKETING. QUALITY OF LAW AS A DERIVATIVE OF CONSENSUS PARLIAMENTARISM
2024, 104, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Klasyfikacja
Język publikacji
Abstrakt
The purpose of the paper is to analyse the relationship between the procedural elements of consensus parliamentarism and the legislative process in the Folketing as well as their impact on the quality of the laws passed. We indicate important differences in the systemic design of the legislative process in the Folketing stemming from the systemic synergy of firm legal regulations and dynamic political agreements made in the pre-parliamentary phase. This defines the legislative process more broadly than is done traditionally and translates into the high quality of legislation to a significant extent. Furthermore, we emphasise the importance of the particular political culture and political pragmatism that characterise Danish political groupings, especially the so-called historical parties. Both of these features are present in Danish consensus parliamentarism and distinguish it from other stable democracies in Europe. The Basic Law of the Kingdom of Denmark, passed in 1953, established a unicameral Folketing structure based on political and pragmatic rationales. Its provisions concluded the over 100-year evolution of the Danish Parliament from asymmetric bicameralism and its various variations in subsequent basic laws, to a unicameral Folketing. This structured and streamlined the legislative process and made the Folketing today the most efficient and effective parliament in Europe in carrying out the legislative function.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Aftale mellem regeringen (Socialdemokraterne, Det Radikale Venstre, Socialistisk Folkeparti) og Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti, Enhedslisten og Det Konserva¬tive Folkeparti, <https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/EnergiKlimapolitik/sol_aftale_151112finaltilweb.pdf> accessed 24 June 2023
Aftale mellem regeringen, Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti, Enhedslisten, Liberal Alliance og Konservative om: Rammer for justering af kommunalreformen (26. juni 2013), <https://www.medcom.dk/media/3208/aftale-om-rammer.pdf> accessed 24 June 2022
Aftale om regionernes økonomi for 2024 sikrer udviklingen af sundhedsvæsenet, <https://fm.dk/nyheder/nyhedsarkiv/2023/maj/aftale-om-regionernes-oekonomi-for-2024-sikrer-udviklingen-af-sundhedsvaesenet/> accessed 24 June 2023
Aftale om regler for ægtefællesammenføring, <https://www.regeringen.dk/aktuelt/publikationer-og-aftaletekster/aftale-om-regler-for-aegtefaellesammenfoering/> accessed 24 June 2023
Aftale om udmøntning af satspuljen for 2018 på integrationsområdet, <https://www.regeringen.dk/aktuelt/publikationer-og-aftaletekster/aftale-om-udmoentning-af-satspuljen-for-2018-paa-integrationsomraadet/> accessed 24 June 2023
Andersen P, Dansk Statsforfatningsret, København 1964
Arter D, Scandinavian Politics Today, Manchester 199992
Bille L, Partier i forandring: En analyse af danske partiorganisationers udvikling 1960-1995, Odense 1997
Christiansen FJ, Politiske forlig i Folketinget. Partikonkurrence og samarbejde, Aarhus 2008
Christiansen FJ, The Inclusion of Challenger Parties into Legislative Accommodations in Danish Parliamentary Politics, Paper, ECPR Conference, Marburg, September 2003
Christensen JP, Lovgivningskvalitet og enkeltsagsstyret lovgivning, Juridisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet 2013, No 10
Christiansen FJ and Damgaard E, Parliamentary Opposition under Minority Parlamentarism: Scandinavia, Journal of Legislative Studies 2008, Vol 14, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330801920937
Christiansen FJ and Pedersen HH, Regeringsgrundlag i Danmark. Hvordan benytter regeringen dem, og hvordan reagerer oppositionen?, Politica 2014, No 3
Christensen JP, Jensen JA, Jensen MH, Dansk Statsret, 3 udgave, København 2020
Christensen JP, Lovkvalitet: »At lave love er ligesom at lave pølser. Man er bedst tjent med ikke at se processen«, Juristen 2006, No 3
Damgaard E, Change and Challenges of Danish Parliamentary Democracy, in The Madisonian Turn. Political Parties and Parliamentary Democracy in Nordic Europe, Bergman T & Strøm K (eds), Ann Arbor 2013
Damgaard E, Party Coalition in Danish Law-making, 1953-1970, European Journal of Political Research 1973, Vol 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1973.tb01282.x
Danmarks Riges Grundlov, 5. juni 1849 (Junigrundloven), <https://danmarkshistorien.dk/vis/materiale/danmarks-riges-grundlov-af-5-juni-1849-junigrundloven/> accessed 10 June 2023
Danmarks Riges Grundlov af 5. juni 1953, Udgivet af Folketinget, København 2009
De økonomiske balanceproblemer i 1970'erne, <https://danmarkshistorien.dk/vis/materiale/de-oekonomiske-balanceproblemer-i-1970erne/> accessed 24 June 2023
Folketinget, Om udvalgene, <https://www.ft.dk/da/udvalg/udvalgene> accessed 24 June 2023
Folketingstidende 1996-2005, <https://www.folketingstidende.dk/da/dokumenttyper> accessed 25 June 2023
Forretningsorden for Folketinget, Udgivet af Folketinget, København 2021
Green-Pedersen C, Hoffmann-Thomsen L, Bloc Politics vs. Broad Cooperation. The Functioning of Danish Minority Parliamentarism, Journal of Legislative Studies 2005, Vol 11, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500158581
Grzybowski M, Dania. Zarys systemu ustrojowego, Kraków 2017
Heidar K, Parties and Party Systems, w: Nordic Politics. Comparative Perspectives, Heidar K (ed), Oslo 2004
Helms L, Studying Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies: Issues and Perspectives, The Journal of Legislative Studies 2008, Vol 14 (1-2) https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330801920788
Justisministeriet, Lovkvalitetsvejledningen, <https://lovkvalitet.dk/lovkvalitetsvejledningen/> accessed 21 June 2023
Justisministeriet, Vejledning om administrative forskrifter, <https://lovkvalitet.dk/vejledning-om-administrative-forskrifter-2/> accessed 21 June 2023
Kanslergadeforliget 1933, <https://danmarkshistorien.dk/leksikon-og-kilder/vis/materi-ale/kanslergadeforliget-og-dansk-politik-i-1930erne/> accessed 23 June 2023
Konstytucja Królestwa Danii, Tłumaczenie i wstęp Grzybowski M, Warszawa 2002
Kubka A, Partie i systemy partyjne Szwecji, Norwegii i Dani na przełomie XX i XXI wieku, Gdańsk 2009
Mattson I, Förhandlingsparlamentarism. En jämförande studie av Riksdagen och Folketinget, Lund 1996
Mattson I, Negotiations in Parliamentary Committees, in The Bargaining Democracy, Stenelo L-G & Jerneck M (eds), Lund 1996
Nissen MR, Det nationale kompromis - Kanslergadeforliget i 1933, Landbohistorisk Tidsskrift 2010, No 1
Nowiak W, Nordycki model "welfare state' w realiach XXI wieku, Poznań 2011
Osiński J, Parlamentaryzm w historii politycznej Danii. Studium ustrojowe, Warszawa 2022
Pagh P, Regelforenkling og lovkvalitet: Gammel vin på nye flasker?, Administrativ Debat 2002, No 4
Pedersen HH, Etableringen af politiske forlig som parlamentarisk praksis, Politica 2011, No 1 <https://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/politica_43_1/pedersen.pdf> accessed 10 June 2023 https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v43i1.69929
Svensson P, Var vore forfatningsfædre demokrater?, TEMP - tidsskrift for historie 2012, No 5 Tillægsbetænkning over Forslag til finanslov for finansåret 1984, Folketingstidende, Folketingsåret 1983-84
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
- Open accessgender identityimmunity passport policyjudgescriterialist view of personhoodFolketingconsensus parliamentarismenvironmental rule of lawproperty taxationcriminal lawbusiness activitypolish-ukrainian relations
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Open accesslegal gendergender identitytrans rightsgender equalitygender recognition
GENDER IDENTITY AS A LEGAL CATEGORY
- Open accessimmunity passportsCOVID-19vaccinationdiscriminationethics
IS THE IMMUNITY PASSPORT POLICY DISCRIMINATORY?
Podobne publikacje
- Open accessgender identityimmunity passport policyjudgescriterialist view of personhoodFolketingconsensus parliamentarismenvironmental rule of lawproperty taxationcriminal lawbusiness activitypolish-ukrainian relations
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Open accesslegal gendergender identitytrans rightsgender equalitygender recognition
GENDER IDENTITY AS A LEGAL CATEGORY
- Open accessimmunity passportsCOVID-19vaccinationdiscriminationethics
IS THE IMMUNITY PASSPORT POLICY DISCRIMINATORY?