BEYOND THE COURTROOM: THE EVOLUTION OF RIGHTS-BASED CLIMATE LITIGATION FROM URGENDA TO HELD AND ITS POLICY IMPACT
2024, 102, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Klasyfikacja
Język publikacji
Abstrakt
This paper examines the growing trend of employing international and human rights law in domestic climate change lawsuits as a strategic tool for legal action. Using a qualitative and comparative analysis of seminal case law, such as Urgenda Foundation v the Netherlands and R (Friends of the Earth and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd and Held v State, this paper aims to explain the juridical trajectories and methodologies employed in rights-based climate litigation. The primary objective is to critically evaluate the potential regulatory impact of this emergent jurisprudential paradigm on both domestic legislation and international climate change treaties. The study posits that when traditional enforcement mechanisms enshrined in international environmental law treaties prove ineffective, domestic litigation grounded in human rights claims serve as a catalyst for transformative jurisprudence. This, in turn, can exert substantial pressure on state and non-state actors, compelling them to adopt more strict regulatory measures to mitigate the effects of climate change. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to elucidate the effectiveness and development of rights-based jurisprudence in climate litigation, and second, to assess its potential for influencing the creation of stronger regulatory mechanisms at both state and international levels. The paper argues that when international treaties fail to take adequate climate change action, domestic lawsuits based on human rights claims start to serve as a lever of change, pressuring both state and non-state actors into adopting more ambitious measures. The study underscores the importance of this rights-based approach not merely as a legal strategy but as a multifaceted tool for effectuating systemic regulatory advancements and fostering climate justice.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, The Environment and Human Rights, Requested by the Republic of Colombia, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (15 November 2017)
Bodansky D, 'Paris Agreement', Introductory Note (United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law 2021)
Carlisle M, 'A Federal Court Threw out a High Profile Climate Lawsuit. Here's What it Might Mean for the Future of Climate Litigation' Time (New York, 17 January 2020) <https://time.com/5767438/climate-lawsuit-kids> accessed 8 March 2024
Espiner T, 'Climate Campaigners Win Heathrow Expansion Case' BBC News (London, 27 February 2020) <www.bbc.com/news/business-51658693> accessed 8 March 2024
Galvão Ferreira P, '"Common but Differentiated Responsibilities" in the National Courts: Lessons from Urgenda v the Netherlands' (2016) 5(2) Transnational Environmental Law 329 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102516000248
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Netherlands 1990-2021, National Inventory Report: RIVM report 2023-0052 (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands 2023)
Greenpeace Nordic Ass'n and Nature and Youth v Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, 16-166674TVI-OTIR/06 (1 April 2018)
Gupta J, 'Legal Steps outside the Climate Convention: Litigation as a Tool to Address Climate Change' (2007) 16(1) Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 76 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2007.00541.x
Held v State, CDV-2020-307, Mont. Dist. Ct., Montana (14 September 2023)
In re Hawai'i Electric Light Co.,152 Haw 352 (SC Haw) (13 March 2023)
Juliana v the United States, 18-36082, 9th Cir. (17 January 2020)
Kemp L, 'A Systems Critique of the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate' in M Hossain, R Hales and T Sarker (eds), Pathways to a Sustainable Economy (Springer 2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67702-6_3
Knox JH, 'Constructing the Human Right to a Healthy Environment' (2020) 16 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 79 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-031720-074856
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 11 December 1997, 2303 UNTS 162
Maria Khan et al. v Federation of Pakistan et al., Writ Petition 8960/2019 (15 February 2019)
Mayer B, 'The Contribution of Urgenda to the Mitigation of Climate Change' (2023) 35(2) Journal of Environmental Law 167 https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqac016
Millar RJ and others, 'Emission Budgets and Pathways Consistent with Limiting Warming to 1.5 °C' (2017) 10 Nature Geoscience 741 https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3031
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Report on the Relationship between Climate Change and Human Rights (Human Rights Council, A/HRC/10/61 2009)
Paris Agreement by Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 12 December 2015, 3156 UNTS 79
Patchell J and Hayter R, 'How Big Business can Save the Climate' Foreign Affairs (92(5) September/October 2013) <www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/commons/2013-08-12/how-big-business-can-save-climate> accessed 8 March 2024
Peel J and Osofsky HM, 'A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation?' (2018) 7(1) Transnational Environmental Law 37 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000292
PUSH Sverige, Fältbiologerna och andra v Sverige regering, T 11594-16 (30 June 2017)
R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 214 (27 February 2020)
R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd [2020] UKSC 52 (16 December 2020)
Rogelj J and others, 'Paris Agreement Climate Proposals Need a Boost to Keep Warming Well below 2 °C' (2016) 534 Nature 631 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law School, Climate Change Litigation Database: Juliana v the United States <https://climatecasechart.com/case/juliana-v-united-states> accessed 8 March 2024
Schurer AP and others, 'Interpretations of the Paris Climate Target' (2018) 11 Nature Geoscience 220 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0086-8
United Nations Environment Programme and Columbia University Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, The Status of Climate Change Litigation: A Global Review (UN Environment and Columbia Law School 2017) <https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/20767> accessed 8 March 2024
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 9 May 1992, S. Treaty Doc No 102-38, 1771 UNTS 107
Urgenda v the Netherlands, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196 (24 June 2015)
Urgenda v the Netherlands, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2018:2591 (9 October 2018)
Urgenda v the Netherlands, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007 (20 December 2019)
Wegener L, 'Can the Paris Agreement Help Climate Change Litigation and Vice Versa?' (2020) 9(1) Transnational Environmental Law 17 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102519000396
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
- Open accesslawlawmakingLegislation
Table of Contents
- Open accesslaw in Polandlaw-making in Poland
GOOD LAW-MAKING IN POLAND: PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES
- Open accessPigouvian taxtax laweconomic analysis of law/law and economicswelfare economicssugar tax
THE THEORY OF WELFARE ECONOMICS AND TAX REGULATIONS: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMPLE OF PIGOUVIAN TAXES
Podobne publikacje
- Open accesslawlawmakingLegislation
Table of Contents
- Open accesslaw in Polandlaw-making in Poland
GOOD LAW-MAKING IN POLAND: PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES
- Open accessPigouvian taxtax laweconomic analysis of law/law and economicswelfare economicssugar tax
THE THEORY OF WELFARE ECONOMICS AND TAX REGULATIONS: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMPLE OF PIGOUVIAN TAXES